Free 12-Week Zone 2 Running and Fitness Program to Build Your Aerobic Base
Having burst on the scene, or should we say strolled casually, Zone 2 training refers to exercising at a moderate intensity of 60-70% of HRmax. This level is challenging enough to increase your heart rate and breathing, yet it remains low enough to be sustained for extended periods.
The name alone seemed to suggest an aura of prestige and scientific bio-hacking; a style of cardio that promised to burn fat, enhance cardiovascular health, and increase longevity.
However, it's essentially just steady-state cardio; does calling it Zone 2 really make a difference? Or, is there something unique? One thing is sure: Zone 2 Cardio sheds light on the numerous benefits of steady-state, so let's take a closer look at this training method.
What Is Zone 2 Training?
Zone 2 training refers to exercising at a moderate intensity of 60-70% of HRmax. This level is challenging enough to increase your heart rate and breathing, yet it remains low enough to be sustained for extended periods.
It's the point where your body primarily uses fat as fuel while maintaining a steady aerobic pace.
Training Zone 2 is just part of the 5 Heart Rate Training Zones. In the endurance and cardio world, these zones are used to prescribe intensity of a session (Esteve-Lanao et. al, 2007).
Heart Rate Training Zones
Zone 1- Recovery Zone (50–60% HRmax) / Very Easy / Warm-up, active recovery
Zone 2- Aerobic Base Zone (60–70% HRmax) / Easy to Moderate / Builds endurance, fat metabolism
Zone 3- Tempo Zone (70–80% HRmax) / Moderate to Hard / Improves aerobic capacity, "no man's land" for some training models
Zone 4- Threshold Zone (80–90% HRmax) / Hard / Raises lactate threshold and VO₂max
Zone 5- Anaerobic or Max Effort Zone (90–100% HRmax) / Very Hard / Sprint or interval training, short bursts
In endurance training, heart-rate "zones" are divided into five levels based on how much oxygen your body uses and how hard your heart works. Zone 2 sits near the bottom of the aerobic range, typically around 60–70% of your maximum heart rate (HRmax).
At this level, your body develops aerobic efficiency, the ability to use oxygen more effectively, and relies on fat for energy rather than carbohydrates (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009).
Many runners and endurance athletes claim to use an 80/20 method of training:
- 80% of training in Zone 2
- 20% of training in Zone 3, 4, 5
Zone 2 vs. Zone 3 Training
Zone 2 and zone 3 training may seem similar, but there are some important differences; primarily, the fuel source and fatigue level.
- Zone 2: Primarily aerobic. Uses fat as the main fuel source. Sustainable for 45–90 minutes or more.
- Zone 3: Transitional. Begins relying more on carbohydrates. Feels "comfortably hard." Sustainable for about 20–40 minutes.
Zone 2 builds the foundation of endurance, what elite athletes call the aerobic base. Training here strengthens mitochondria and capillary density, improving recovery and performance at higher intensities (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009).
Zone 2 Vs. Steady State Vs. LISS
You may see these terms thrown around, all referring to similar things. While they are similar, there are some specific differences.
Zone 2 Training- Zone 2 training is a style of cardio where a person keeps their heart rate in Zone 2 (60-70% 1RM)
Steady State Training- The term "steady state" refers to a style of cardio where a person runs at the same intensity. This is in comparison to interval training. While it includes Zone 2 training, it could also use Zone 3 or even Zone 4.
LISS- LISS cardio simply stands for Low-Intensity Steady State. There's no hard definition for intensity, but it tends to be on the lower end of Zone 2.
Benefits of Training in Zone 2 (Science-Backed)
So what's the big deal with Zone 2 training? Here are some benefits that you can get from using this training method.
1. Increases Mitochondrial Density
Zone 2 training enhances the number and efficiency of mitochondria, the energy-producing "powerhouses" of your cells.
More mitochondria means your body can produce ATP more efficiently, meaning your body can produce energy from fat oxidation instead of glycogen.
Studies show regular moderate-intensity endurance exercise significantly boosts mitochondrial density and oxidative enzymes (Holloszy, 1967; Granata et al., 2018).
2. Improves Metabolic Health and Insulin Sensitivity
Working in Zone 2 enhances your muscles' ability to use fat for fuel, which improves insulin sensitivity and glucose regulation. These are both critical for long-term health.
In research on adults with metabolic disorders, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise improved insulin sensitivity by up to 25% after 12 weeks (Di Menna et al., 2018).
3. Strengthens the Heart and Increases VO₂ Max
Training in Zone 2 strengthens the heart by increasing stroke volume, the amount of blood pumped with each heartbeat.
This adaptation improves overall cardiovascular efficiency, meaning your heart can deliver more oxygen to working muscles with less effort.
Over time, consistent Zone 2 training elevates VO₂ max, the most accurate measure of aerobic fitness. A higher VO₂ max indicates a stronger heart, greater endurance capacity, and a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and premature death.
Research from the American Heart Association emphasizes that cardiorespiratory fitness is one of the strongest predictors of longevity, independent of age or body composition (Ross et al., 2016).
4. Promotes Fat Loss
Zone 2 training relies heavily on fat oxidation, making it one of the most efficient ways to burn stored body fat without overstressing the joints or nervous system.
Although high-intensity workouts burn more calories per minute, Zone 2 exercise allows for a greater percentage of energy from fat and can be sustained for much longer.
Over time, this improves your body's ability to use fat as fuel, a process known as metabolic flexibility (Achten & Jeukendrup, 2004).
However, it's important to note that Zone 2 training won't cause fat loss in a caloric surplus. You must still maintain an overall energy deficit for stored fat to be used as fuel.
5. Enhances Recovery and Longevity
Zone 2 promotes recovery by increasing blood flow without excessive strain. It's light enough to perform frequently—sometimes daily—while still delivering cardiovascular benefit.
Research also links better cardiorespiratory fitness with lower all-cause mortality, independent of age or BMI (Kodama et al., 2009).
HIIT Vs. Zone 2 Training for Fat Loss
Losing fat is a huge topic among trainees, who constantly debate the best form of exercise for weight loss. As such, many trainees are drawn to Zone 2 training to burn calories and lose fat.
Relying primarily on fat as a fuel source, Zone 2 helps your body become more metabolically flexible—the ability to switch between fat and carbohydrates efficiently.
Athletes often use this training to "retrain" the body's metabolism, improving endurance and controlling weight without dietary extremes.
In addition, while HIIT may burn more calories faster, Zone 2 training can be performed for longer periods of time, cranking out calories.
This is a highly nuanced topic, so if you're interested in the details, check out our article here.
However, research shows that in the long-term, both HIIT and Zone 2 steady-state training are effective at losing fat and improving body composition (Steele et. al, 2021).
Consistency matters more than duration. The longer you maintain Zone 2 heart rate, the more your body adapts to burn fat efficiently. Start slow and build up your engine.
How to Know You're in Zone 2
Saying you should run in Zone 2 is great, but how do you actually know you're training at the appropriate intensity?
Heart Rate for Zone 2 Training
The first thing you need to do is determine what your heart rate should be to qualify for Zone 2 training. To do that, you can do a simple estimate with this heart rate formula.
- Zone 2 HR = 60–70% × (220 – your age)
For example, here's how you would estimate a 40-year-old's Zone 2 range;
- Zone 2 = 60-70% x (220- age)
- Zone 2 = 60-70% x (220- 40)
- Zone 2 = 60-70% x (180)
- Zone 2 = 108–126 bpm
However, formulas can vary by individual. The most accurate method comes from a lactate threshold test, which identifies the point just before your body shifts from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism (San Millán & Brooks, 2018).
That's great, but it still doesn't help when you're actually running. How do you determine your heart rate? Luckily, there are a few methods you can use.
1. The Talk Test
If you can speak in full sentences but not sing, you're likely in Zone 2. Too breathless to talk comfortably? You've drifted into Zone 3 or above.
The talk test may seem overly simplistic, but it's actually fairly accurate. This is especially true for your amateur runner or anyone who doesn't want to get bogged down with running tech.
In fact, if you spend time in running communities, you'll often hear from individuals that "slowing down to a pace you can talk" has made the most significant improvements in overall running ability.
2. Chest-Strap Heart-Rate Monitor
If you're trying to get serious about your running and don't mind the tech, a chest-strap heart rate monitor is going to be your best bet.
Using a chest-strap heart-rate monitor or wrist device helps you stay within your target range. Many brands allow you to set up "alerts" that will notify you when you're training outside the intended range.
3. Smartwatches and Apps
Many fitness watches (Garmin, Polar, Apple Watch, Coros, WHOOP) automatically calculate heart-rate zones and alert you if you exceed your range. Use the "Zone 2" or "Aerobic" setting in your app for real-time feedback.
In real-time, watches can exhibit significant variability and inaccuracies due to issues with accurately reading heart rate. Some users claim that while the accuracy may be off, smart watches are more useful in tracking trends, i.e., you can tell when your heart rate increases or decreases.
Regardless, while they can be useful, don't put 100% trust in them. To optimize your experience, use the same watch and track its behavior.
Zone 2 Running Program To Build Your Aerobic Base (12 Weeks)
Weekly Schedule Overview
- Frequency: 3–5 sessions per week
- Effort: Easy, conversational pace (Zone 2)
- Progression: Add 5–10 minutes per week to one long run
- Goal: Build a strong aerobic base for endurance, fat loss, or performance
- While this is for running, you can easily use the same blueprint for cycling or other endurance exercises.
Keep in mind that many runners advocate spending 80% of their time in Zone 2, so this is the bulk of your training. If you want to add some high-intensity training, save that until the 3rd month.
Week 1–4: Establish Your Aerobic Base
Your first month should be focused on establishing your aerobic base. This involves some experimentation to build your endurance. Your primary goals are to focus on breathing and form.
Monday- 20-minute Zone 2 run (Easy pace; focus on relaxed breathing and posture). Every week, your goal is to focus on form and maintain your pace.
Wednesday- 30-minute Zone 2 run (Keep your HR between 60–70% HRmax). If you need to, use a walk-run method at first. Every week, minimize the need to walk. If you can run non-stop, add 5 mins weekly.
Friday- Optional cross-training (45–60 minutes of Zone 2 cycling, rucking, walking, or rowing).
Sunday- Long Zone 2 run (50–60 minutes). Stay slow and consistent. Hydrate well and track your average HR. Use a walk-run method if you need. Your goal is to stay moving the whole time.
Week 4-8: Build Your Aerobic Base
The next 4 weeks are focused on building your aerobic base. You should focus on adding time on your feet.
Monday- Increase your run to a 30-minute Zone 2 run at an easy pace. Really focus on your breathing and posture.
Wednesday- 45-minute Zone 2 run (Keep your HR between 60–70% HRmax. This should feel comfortable and rhythmic)
Friday- Optional cross-training (45–60 minutes of Zone 2 cycling, walking, or rowing)
Sunday- Long Zone 2 run (50–60 minutes). Stay slow and consistent. Hydrate well and track your average HR. Every week, add 5 mins to your total time, even if that means walking.
Week 9-12 Build Endurance
The next 4 weeks will start pushing your long run and also include hills for some variability.
Monday – 35-minute Zone 2 run. Include hills if available.
Wednesday – 45-minute steady Zone 2 run. If you have a heart monitor, try to maintain your heart rate.
Friday- Optional cross-training (45–60 minutes of Zone 2 cycling, walking, or rowing)
Saturday– Recovery walk or light ruck (30–45 minutes). Keep HR below 60% max. Active recovery helps maintain aerobic volume.
Sunday – Long Zone 2 run (65–75 minutes). Focus on maintaining even pacing; breathing should remain easy.
Week 12+ Extend and Stabilize
Now it's time to really start building your volume and overall endurance.
Monday – 40-minute Zone 2 run. Stay at around 60-65% of your HRmax.
Wednesday – 50-minute Zone 2 run. Include more hills if available. Play with your heart rate, i.e., 5min at 60% HRmax / 5min at 70% HRmax / 5min at 65% HRmax.
Friday – Cross-training day (optional) 60-minute Zone 2 cycle, swim, or brisk walk.
Saturday– Recovery walk or light ruck (30–45 minutes). Keep HR below 60% max. Active recovery helps maintain aerobic volume.
Sunday – Long Zone 2 run (80–90 minutes). Your main endurance builder. Stay strictly aerobic; resist the urge to push pace.
Progression Guidelines
- Add 5–10 minutes per week to one or two sessions (typically the long run).
- Keep all runs conversational.
- Every 4th week, reduce total volume by 20% to allow recovery and adaptation.
- After 6–8 weeks, retest your pace or heart rate. Most runners will see a lower heart rate at the same speed, meaning improved efficiency.
Optimizing Your Fitness With Zone 2 Training
Zone 2 training isn't just for athletes; it's one of the most accessible, research-supported methods to improve endurance, metabolic health, and longevity. This is a great example
of how training doesn't need to be complicated to be effective. In fact, many runners and cardio athletes have unknowingly been performing Zone 2 training!
Whether you're walking, cycling, or rucking, keeping your heart rate in the 60–70% range builds a strong foundation of aerobic fitness that supports literally everything else you do.
References
- Achten, J., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2004). Optimizing fat oxidation through exercise and diet. Nutrition, 20(7–8), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.005
- Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
- DiMenna, F. J., & Arad, A. D. (2018). Exercise as' precision medicine' for insulin resistance and its progression to type 2 diabetes: A research review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-018-0110-8
- Esteve-Lanao, J., Foster, C., Seiler, S., & Lucia, A. (2007). Impact of training intensity distribution on performance in endurance athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(3), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-19725.1
- Granata, C., Jamnick, N. A., & Bishop, D. J. (2018). Training-induced changes in mitochondrial content and respiratory function in human skeletal muscle. Sports Medicine, 48(8), 1809–1828. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-018-0936-y
- Holloszy, J. O. (1967). Biochemical adaptations in muscle: Effects of exercise on mitochondrial oxygen uptake and respiratory enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 242(9), 2278–2282. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4290225/
- Kodama, S., et al. (2009). Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. JAMA, 301(19), 2024–2035. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.681
- Ross, R., et al. (2016). Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: A case for fitness as a clinical vital sign. Circulation, 134(24), e653–e699. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461
- Steele, J., Plotkin, D., Van Every, D., Rosa, A., Zambrano, H., Mendelovits, B., Carrasquillo-Mercado, M., Grgic, J., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2021). Slow and Steady, or Hard and Fast? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Body Composition Changes between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training. Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 9(11), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9110155
0 Comments